Impact of Adopted Village Extension Project (AVEP) Agricultural Technologies Transfer on Income of Participants from Selected Research Institutes in Nigeria Impact of Adopted Village Extension Project (AVEP)

Main Article Content

Y. Muhammed
O. J Ajayi
J. H Tsado
I. S Umar

Abstract

This study determined the impact of Adopted Village Extension Project (AVEP) agricultural technologies transfer on income of participants from selected research institutes in Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling procedure was employed to select 492 respondents comprising of 246 participants and non-participants, respectively on which structured questionnaire was administered complemented with an interview schedule. Primary data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency counts, percentages and mean; Gini coefficient model and z-test statistics. Findings from the study revealed that majority (83.7%) of the participants were male and 91.9% were married, while majority (90.2%) of the non-participants were male and 93.1% were married. The mean age, education, farming experience, household size and farm size of the participants were 37 years, 13 years, 13 years, 6 people amd 3 hectares respectively, while mean age, education, farming experience, household size and farm size of the non-participants were 52 years, 8 years, 19 years, 10 people amd 5 hectares respectively. The result of the gini-coefficient for the participants revealed mean annual income of  ₦1,008,963 with gini index of 0.4474, while that of non-participants was ₦427,283 with gini index of 0.3001. The z-test statistics value of 27.084 at 1% level of probability revealed that there is a significant difference in income of the participants and non-participants. In conclusion, agricultural technologies transfer through AVEP of research institutes had significant impact of the income of the participants. Therefore, the study recommended that the project should be scaled-up to accommodate more participants and other villages due to the significant impact

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammed, Y., Ajayi, O. J., Tsado, J. H. ., & Umar, I. S. . (2023). Impact of Adopted Village Extension Project (AVEP) Agricultural Technologies Transfer on Income of Participants from Selected Research Institutes in Nigeria: Impact of Adopted Village Extension Project (AVEP) . BADEGGI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENT, 5(3), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.35849/BJARE202303/129/007
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

O. J Ajayi, Federal University of Technology Minna

Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

J. H Tsado, Federal University of Technology Minna

Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

References

Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria (ARCN) (2011). Implementation of the Adopted Villages and Agricultural Research Outreach Centres (AROCs) by the National Agricultural Research Institutes (NARIs) and Federal Colleges of Agriculture (FCAs). A Draft Document. July, 2011.

Ajayi, O. J., Muhammed, Y., Yusuf, L. T. and Ajibola, R. T. (2020). Climate change adaptation strategies among groundnut farmers in Suleja LGA of Niger State, Nigeria. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 13 (4): 414 – 424.

Akinola, M. O., Odu, M. E. and Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. (2013). The Adopted Village Project and Farm Income of Beneficiary Households in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Journal of Study tribes and Tribal, 11 (2): 121 – 126.

Bakare, A. S. (2012). Measuring the income inequality in Nigeria. The Lorenze curve and Gini coefficient Approach. American Journal of Economic, 2 (1): 47 – 52.

Harmon, C. (2023). Gini Coefficient shows progress in Nigeria’s Wealth Distribution under Democracy. Retrieved from https://nairametric.com/2023/03/21/gini-coefficient-shows-progress-in-nigerias-wealth-distribution-under-democracy/ on 2nd October, 2023

Muhammed, Y. (2015). Impact of Survival Farming Intervention Programme (SFIP) in selected LGAs of Kogi State, Nigeria. An MSc Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

Muhammed, Y., Akpoko, J. G., Musa, M. W., Ajayi, O. J. and Muhammad, H. U. (2019). Factors influencing participation of cassava farmers in Survival Farming Intervention Programme (SFIP) in Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 23 (2): 22 – 30.

Muhammed, Y., Muhammad, H. U., Ajogwu, C. E., Umaru, A. and Jibrin, S. (2021). Socio-economic factors influencing the output of catfish farmers in Chanchaga Local Government Area of Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 24 (1): 5604 – 5609.

National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) (2023): First Quarter Statistics Report. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Abuja, Pp 149.

National Population Commission (NPC) (2006). Provisional Census Figure of Nigeria: NPC/FGN, Abuja, Nigeria.

Oduehie, T. C. (2015). Impact of NAERLS adopted village project on beneficiaries’ livelihood in Abia and Oyo States, Nigeria. An unpublished MSc Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

Owolabi, J. O. (2019). Impact of Animal Traction Technology Usage on Food Seurity Status of Small-holder Farmers in NorthWestern, Nigeria. An Unpublished PhD Thesis of the Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Pp 223.

Reddy, W. R. (2010). Village adoption and development programme guidelines. National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj (NIRD&PR), Ministry of Rural Development, Gol Rajendranagar, India.

Shahid, S. N. (2004). Village adoption scheme: A model for rural development. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

Waris, A., Khan, S., Urrahman, A., Hronec, M. and Suplata, M. (2023). Measurement of income inequality and its determinants in Lower District of Pakistan. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 12: 180 – 202.